{
"title": "Preserving the possibility of inquiry — Research & questions",
"text": "MODAVIS (2026). Preserving the possibility of inquiry — Research & questions. Research notebooks, September 2026 · expanded edition. https://modavis.org/editions/2026-09-r3/research/introduction/",
"bibtex": "@misc{modavis_research_introduction_2026_09_r3,\n author = {{MODAVIS}},\n title = {Preserving the possibility of inquiry — Research & questions},\n year = {2026},\n month = {09},\n version = {2026-09-r3},\n url = {https://modavis.org/editions/2026-09-r3/research/introduction/},\n note = {Content SHA-256: 2f7f1984151a14d327a9a04c8a39b9aa3fef54b698269a0bbcc08c4a383d9c5a}\n}",
"url": "https://modavis.org/editions/2026-09-r3/research/introduction/",
"sha256": "2f7f1984151a14d327a9a04c8a39b9aa3fef54b698269a0bbcc08c4a383d9c5a",
"edition": "2026-09-r3",
"date": "2026-09-26",
"canonicalPayload": "{\"book\":{\"number\":\"02\",\"slug\":\"research\",\"title\":\"Research & questions\"},\"chapter\":{\"blocks\":[{\"text\":\"Musical instruments are physical objects, historical witnesses and systems of action. Their sounding behavior depends on material, construction, configuration, room and use. Digitization brings these perspectives together, but also introduces choices about what to measure and how to represent it.\",\"type\":\"p\"},{\"id\":\"two-translations\",\"text\":\"Two translations\",\"type\":\"heading\"},{\"text\":\"The first translation moves from an instrument and its sources into a digital representation. The second turns that representation into something a person can hear, explore or play. Each stage selects, transforms and leaves things out.\",\"type\":\"p\"},{\"caption\":\"Source → representation → experience. Documented evidence and interpretative decisions remain available alongside the result.\",\"kind\":\"evidence\",\"type\":\"figure\"},{\"id\":\"questions\",\"text\":\"Three guiding questions\",\"type\":\"heading\"},{\"items\":[\"What must be documented for a representation to remain scientifically interpretable?\",\"How can heterogeneous sources and measurements be related without hiding disagreement?\",\"How can interactive access retain the boundaries and uncertainties of its evidence?\"],\"type\":\"list\"},{\"text\":\"MODAVIS connects these questions through research data infrastructure, a semantic model and the Virtual Acoustic Object standard. Pipe organs serve as a demanding principal case; the models distinguish instrument-neutral concepts from organ-specific ones.\",\"type\":\"p\"},{\"id\":\"why-organs\",\"text\":\"Why organs make the problem visible\",\"type\":\"heading\"},{\"text\":\"An organ brings many scales of evidence into one instrument: a named workshop, a building, changing configurations, mechanisms, individual pipes and recorded sound. A later intervention may preserve a case while altering its contents, or preserve pipes while changing their relationships. An undifferentiated record cannot express those histories adequately.\",\"type\":\"p\"},{\"text\":\"The digital object introduces further choices. A photograph can document a surviving arrangement, a model can reconstruct a proposed earlier state, and a recording can capture a particular session in a particular room. Placing them next to one another is useful only if the reader can see which relationships are established and which are interpretative.\",\"type\":\"p\"},{\"id\":\"contributions\",\"text\":\"Three connected research contributions\",\"type\":\"heading\"},{\"headers\":[\"Contribution\",\"Research purpose\"],\"rows\":[[\"Source-aware data\",\"Connect heterogeneous accounts while retaining attribution and unresolved cases.\"],[\"Explicit representation\",\"Describe instruments, states, evidence and digital realizations through compatible semantic and exchange contracts.\"],[\"Interactive access\",\"Make selected relationships audible, visible or playable while preserving a route to their documentation.\"]],\"type\":\"table\"},{\"id\":\"evaluation\",\"text\":\"What would make a result convincing?\",\"type\":\"heading\"},{\"text\":\"Different claims require different evidence. File checks can establish fixity. A replay can establish that a documented procedure produces the expected output under specified conditions. A numerical comparison can assess a model against observations. None of those alone establishes an attribution to a historical maker or a listener’s judgement of authenticity. The notebooks therefore describe both the contribution and the level at which it has been examined.\",\"type\":\"p\"},{\"items\":[{\"href\":\"/notebooks/research/glossary/\",\"label\":\"A glossary of the recurring distinctions\"}],\"type\":\"links\"},{\"items\":[{\"detail\":\"Browse the complete MODAVIS ecosystem.\",\"href\":\"/notebooks/software/directory/\",\"label\":\"Related software and research collections\"}],\"type\":\"links\"}],\"intro\":\"The aim is to make sounding heritage accessible while keeping the evidence behind each representation inspectable.\",\"slug\":\"introduction\",\"sources\":[{\"detail\":\"Musikinstrumente im virtuellen Raum, submitted 11 September 2026.\",\"href\":\"/notebooks/about/research/\",\"label\":\"About the doctoral research\"},{\"detail\":\"The published semantic model.\",\"href\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22126086\",\"label\":\"MODAVIS Ontology Network 0.1.0\"},{\"detail\":\"The versioned specification and reference tools.\",\"href\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22214248\",\"label\":\"VAO Standard 0.5.0\"}],\"title\":\"Preserving the possibility of inquiry\"},\"date\":\"2026-09-26\",\"edition\":\"2026-09-r3\",\"figures\":{\"evidence\":\"\"}}",
"payload": {
"edition": "2026-09-r3",
"date": "2026-09-26",
"book": {
"slug": "research",
"title": "Research & questions",
"number": "02"
},
"chapter": {
"slug": "introduction",
"title": "Preserving the possibility of inquiry",
"intro": "The aim is to make sounding heritage accessible while keeping the evidence behind each representation inspectable.",
"blocks": [
{
"type": "p",
"text": "Musical instruments are physical objects, historical witnesses and systems of action. Their sounding behavior depends on material, construction, configuration, room and use. Digitization brings these perspectives together, but also introduces choices about what to measure and how to represent it."
},
{
"type": "heading",
"text": "Two translations",
"id": "two-translations"
},
{
"type": "p",
"text": "The first translation moves from an instrument and its sources into a digital representation. The second turns that representation into something a person can hear, explore or play. Each stage selects, transforms and leaves things out."
},
{
"type": "figure",
"kind": "evidence",
"caption": "Source → representation → experience. Documented evidence and interpretative decisions remain available alongside the result."
},
{
"type": "heading",
"text": "Three guiding questions",
"id": "questions"
},
{
"type": "list",
"items": [
"What must be documented for a representation to remain scientifically interpretable?",
"How can heterogeneous sources and measurements be related without hiding disagreement?",
"How can interactive access retain the boundaries and uncertainties of its evidence?"
]
},
{
"type": "p",
"text": "MODAVIS connects these questions through research data infrastructure, a semantic model and the Virtual Acoustic Object standard. Pipe organs serve as a demanding principal case; the models distinguish instrument-neutral concepts from organ-specific ones."
},
{
"type": "heading",
"text": "Why organs make the problem visible",
"id": "why-organs"
},
{
"type": "p",
"text": "An organ brings many scales of evidence into one instrument: a named workshop, a building, changing configurations, mechanisms, individual pipes and recorded sound. A later intervention may preserve a case while altering its contents, or preserve pipes while changing their relationships. An undifferentiated record cannot express those histories adequately."
},
{
"type": "p",
"text": "The digital object introduces further choices. A photograph can document a surviving arrangement, a model can reconstruct a proposed earlier state, and a recording can capture a particular session in a particular room. Placing them next to one another is useful only if the reader can see which relationships are established and which are interpretative."
},
{
"type": "heading",
"text": "Three connected research contributions",
"id": "contributions"
},
{
"type": "table",
"headers": [
"Contribution",
"Research purpose"
],
"rows": [
[
"Source-aware data",
"Connect heterogeneous accounts while retaining attribution and unresolved cases."
],
[
"Explicit representation",
"Describe instruments, states, evidence and digital realizations through compatible semantic and exchange contracts."
],
[
"Interactive access",
"Make selected relationships audible, visible or playable while preserving a route to their documentation."
]
]
},
{
"type": "heading",
"text": "What would make a result convincing?",
"id": "evaluation"
},
{
"type": "p",
"text": "Different claims require different evidence. File checks can establish fixity. A replay can establish that a documented procedure produces the expected output under specified conditions. A numerical comparison can assess a model against observations. None of those alone establishes an attribution to a historical maker or a listener’s judgement of authenticity. The notebooks therefore describe both the contribution and the level at which it has been examined."
},
{
"type": "links",
"items": [
{
"label": "A glossary of the recurring distinctions",
"href": "/notebooks/research/glossary/"
}
]
},
{
"type": "links",
"items": [
{
"label": "Related software and research collections",
"href": "/notebooks/software/directory/",
"detail": "Browse the complete MODAVIS ecosystem."
}
]
}
],
"sources": [
{
"label": "About the doctoral research",
"href": "/notebooks/about/research/",
"detail": "Musikinstrumente im virtuellen Raum, submitted 11 September 2026."
},
{
"label": "MODAVIS Ontology Network 0.1.0",
"href": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22126086",
"detail": "The published semantic model."
},
{
"label": "VAO Standard 0.5.0",
"href": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22214248",
"detail": "The versioned specification and reference tools."
}
]
},
"figures": {
"evidence": ""
}
}
}