{
  "title": "Different ways of encountering an object — Tools & experiences",
  "text": "MODAVIS (2026). Different ways of encountering an object — Tools & experiences. Research notebooks, September 2026 · Connected evidence edition. https://modavis.org/editions/2026-09-r6/software/experiences/",
  "bibtex": "@misc{modavis_software_experiences_2026_09_r6,\n  author = {{MODAVIS}},\n  title = {Different ways of encountering an object — Tools & experiences},\n  year = {2026},\n  month = {09},\n  version = {2026-09-r6},\n  url = {https://modavis.org/editions/2026-09-r6/software/experiences/},\n  note = {Content SHA-256: 66ff07188f4b746a8bfd6e3406cb23ea5198d137207f506b33d617f0a85c8915}\n}",
  "url": "https://modavis.org/editions/2026-09-r6/software/experiences/",
  "sha256": "66ff07188f4b746a8bfd6e3406cb23ea5198d137207f506b33d617f0a85c8915",
  "edition": "2026-09-r6",
  "date": "2026-09-26",
  "canonicalPayload": "{\"book\":{\"number\":\"06\",\"slug\":\"software\",\"title\":\"Tools & experiences\"},\"chapter\":{\"blocks\":[{\"id\":\"spatial\",\"text\":\"Explore in context\",\"type\":\"heading\"},{\"text\":\"A geographic interface places an instrument in a landscape of places and relationships. A three-dimensional view instead offers a spatial representation of the object itself. Neither perspective replaces the source record.\",\"type\":\"p\"},{\"id\":\"listen\",\"text\":\"Listen and interact\",\"type\":\"heading\"},{\"text\":\"A playable representation can relate actions to sound, while an auralization can explore the role of a room or listening position. Each depends on a particular dataset and model, and needs to declare those dependencies.\",\"type\":\"p\"},{\"id\":\"capability\",\"text\":\"Keep capability explicit\",\"type\":\"heading\"},{\"text\":\"VAO profiles allow a package to declare the experiences and resources it actually supports. A viewer should respect those declarations rather than implying that every object provides playback, augmented reality or a complete simulation.\",\"type\":\"p\"},{\"boundary\":\"No acoustics profile or calibrated acoustic response is inferred from the presence of an organ model.\",\"caseLabel\":\"Cuntz\",\"concept\":\"A profile names a set of requirements for a capability. A client’s support describes what an application can do with the object; the two declarations must be compared.\",\"evidence\":\"Released record\",\"expanded\":false,\"id\":\"cuntz-profiles\",\"scenario\":\"The Cuntz manifest declares Core, Dynamic Delivery, Playable, Physical Instrument, Scientific, Multimodal, Spatial and Zenodo Repository profiles under VAO 0.5.0.\",\"sources\":[{\"detail\":\"Published manifest: identities, measurement observations, realization digests, profiles and rights. Exact examples checked against this release.\",\"href\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22151203\",\"label\":\"Cuntz Positiv · VAO 0.5.0-rc.2\"},{\"detail\":\"The standard contract is separate from the Cuntz dataset content version 0.5.0-rc.2.\",\"href\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22214248\",\"label\":\"VAO Standard 0.5.0\"}],\"steps\":[{\"text\":\"The object contains information for several uses, including physical topology, scientific observations and sampled interaction. These requirements describe the package contract.\",\"title\":\"Read the object’s declarations\"},{\"text\":\"The notebook loads a GLB display derivative and provides camera controls. It does not import the full VAO manifest, evaluate its scientific records or execute its keyboard and stop behavior.\",\"title\":\"State the viewer’s operation\"},{\"text\":\"To test sampled playback or synchronized controls, choose a client whose documented version supports the relevant format, profiles and resources. Record the tested operation separately from successful visual loading.\",\"title\":\"Choose another client when the task changes\"}],\"takeaway\":\"A working 3D preview proves that the chosen model can be displayed; it does not establish complete VAO conformance or playability.\",\"title\":\"Does showing the organ in 3D mean the VAO is playable?\",\"type\":\"example\"},{\"id\":\"experience-comparison\",\"text\":\"Different experiences answer different questions\",\"type\":\"heading\"},{\"headers\":[\"Experience\",\"What it makes accessible\",\"What to inspect\"],\"rows\":[[\"Geographic browsing\",\"Place and regional relationships.\",\"Location precision, dates and collection coverage.\"],[\"Three-dimensional inspection\",\"Visible form, spatial relationships and selected geometry.\",\"Scale, reconstruction status and capture basis.\"],[\"Sampled playback\",\"A mapping between controls and recorded resources.\",\"Instrument state, sample coverage, tuning and transformations.\"],[\"Auralization\",\"A modelled listening situation.\",\"Source, room, receiver and model assumptions.\"],[\"Signal analysis\",\"Measured properties of selected recordings.\",\"Input region, parameters and interpretation scope.\"]],\"type\":\"table\"},{\"text\":\"Combining these views can make the research easier to explore. The combination should also preserve their differences: rotating a model is not evidence that the same representation supplies a validated acoustic simulation, and a plausible sound does not establish that its control mapping recreates historical playing conditions.\",\"type\":\"p\"},{\"id\":\"unavailable-capabilities\",\"text\":\"Let unavailable capabilities remain visible\",\"type\":\"heading\"},{\"text\":\"An interface can show what a package supports, what requires another resource group and what the current runtime cannot execute. That makes a limited but honest experience more useful than a control that appears to work while silently substituting content. Users should be able to return from an interactive action to the resource and interpretation on which it depends.\",\"type\":\"p\"},{\"id\":\"evaluate-experience\",\"text\":\"Evaluate the claim made by the experience\",\"type\":\"heading\"},{\"text\":\"Use technical tests for technical claims and appropriate empirical methods for perceptual or historical ones. Latency, signal agreement, package conformance and a player’s judgement of touch are different observations. The thesis’s technical demonstrations support bounded implementation and analytical claims; they do not replace participant studies of listening or playability.\",\"type\":\"p\"},{\"text\":\"PAMT outlines a route from geometry and material interpretation to room-acoustic modelling. VAO-Pipe evaluates passive eigenmodes of procedurally reconstructed pipes. Neither should be presented as a generic, complete synthesis engine for every VAO.\",\"title\":\"PAMT and VAO-Pipe have different scopes\",\"type\":\"note\"},{\"items\":[{\"href\":\"https://vaoxr.modavis.org/\",\"label\":\"Open vaoXR\"},{\"href\":\"/notebooks/vao/introduction/\",\"label\":\"Read the VAO notebook\"}],\"type\":\"links\"}],\"intro\":\"Spatial, acoustic and analytical views make different aspects of the same object available.\",\"slug\":\"experiences\",\"sources\":[{\"detail\":\"Dissertation submitted to Universität Leipzig, 11 September 2026. Chapters 1–6 and 8; Appendix I.4 for the software and resource inventory. See the dedicated research guides for claim-specific section references. Page numbers refer to the printed manuscript pagination. The manuscript is not distributed by this website.\",\"label\":\"Dominik Ukolov · Musikinstrumente im virtuellen Raum (2026)\"},{\"detail\":\"The versioned specification and reference tools.\",\"href\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22214248\",\"label\":\"VAO Standard 0.5.0\"}],\"title\":\"Different ways of encountering an object\"},\"date\":\"2026-09-26\",\"edition\":\"2026-09-r6\",\"figures\":{}}",
  "payload": {
    "edition": "2026-09-r6",
    "date": "2026-09-26",
    "book": {
      "slug": "software",
      "title": "Tools & experiences",
      "number": "06"
    },
    "chapter": {
      "slug": "experiences",
      "title": "Different ways of encountering an object",
      "intro": "Spatial, acoustic and analytical views make different aspects of the same object available.",
      "blocks": [
        {
          "type": "heading",
          "text": "Explore in context",
          "id": "spatial"
        },
        {
          "type": "p",
          "text": "A geographic interface places an instrument in a landscape of places and relationships. A three-dimensional view instead offers a spatial representation of the object itself. Neither perspective replaces the source record."
        },
        {
          "type": "heading",
          "text": "Listen and interact",
          "id": "listen"
        },
        {
          "type": "p",
          "text": "A playable representation can relate actions to sound, while an auralization can explore the role of a room or listening position. Each depends on a particular dataset and model, and needs to declare those dependencies."
        },
        {
          "type": "heading",
          "text": "Keep capability explicit",
          "id": "capability"
        },
        {
          "type": "p",
          "text": "VAO profiles allow a package to declare the experiences and resources it actually supports. A viewer should respect those declarations rather than implying that every object provides playback, augmented reality or a complete simulation."
        },
        {
          "type": "example",
          "id": "cuntz-profiles",
          "title": "Does showing the organ in 3D mean the VAO is playable?",
          "concept": "A profile names a set of requirements for a capability. A client’s support describes what an application can do with the object; the two declarations must be compared.",
          "scenario": "The Cuntz manifest declares Core, Dynamic Delivery, Playable, Physical Instrument, Scientific, Multimodal, Spatial and Zenodo Repository profiles under VAO 0.5.0.",
          "steps": [
            {
              "title": "Read the object’s declarations",
              "text": "The object contains information for several uses, including physical topology, scientific observations and sampled interaction. These requirements describe the package contract."
            },
            {
              "title": "State the viewer’s operation",
              "text": "The notebook loads a GLB display derivative and provides camera controls. It does not import the full VAO manifest, evaluate its scientific records or execute its keyboard and stop behavior."
            },
            {
              "title": "Choose another client when the task changes",
              "text": "To test sampled playback or synchronized controls, choose a client whose documented version supports the relevant format, profiles and resources. Record the tested operation separately from successful visual loading."
            }
          ],
          "takeaway": "A working 3D preview proves that the chosen model can be displayed; it does not establish complete VAO conformance or playability.",
          "boundary": "No acoustics profile or calibrated acoustic response is inferred from the presence of an organ model.",
          "sources": [
            {
              "label": "Cuntz Positiv · VAO 0.5.0-rc.2",
              "href": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22151203",
              "detail": "Published manifest: identities, measurement observations, realization digests, profiles and rights. Exact examples checked against this release."
            },
            {
              "label": "VAO Standard 0.5.0",
              "href": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22214248",
              "detail": "The standard contract is separate from the Cuntz dataset content version 0.5.0-rc.2."
            }
          ],
          "expanded": false,
          "caseLabel": "Cuntz",
          "evidence": "Released record"
        },
        {
          "type": "heading",
          "text": "Different experiences answer different questions",
          "id": "experience-comparison"
        },
        {
          "type": "table",
          "headers": [
            "Experience",
            "What it makes accessible",
            "What to inspect"
          ],
          "rows": [
            [
              "Geographic browsing",
              "Place and regional relationships.",
              "Location precision, dates and collection coverage."
            ],
            [
              "Three-dimensional inspection",
              "Visible form, spatial relationships and selected geometry.",
              "Scale, reconstruction status and capture basis."
            ],
            [
              "Sampled playback",
              "A mapping between controls and recorded resources.",
              "Instrument state, sample coverage, tuning and transformations."
            ],
            [
              "Auralization",
              "A modelled listening situation.",
              "Source, room, receiver and model assumptions."
            ],
            [
              "Signal analysis",
              "Measured properties of selected recordings.",
              "Input region, parameters and interpretation scope."
            ]
          ]
        },
        {
          "type": "p",
          "text": "Combining these views can make the research easier to explore. The combination should also preserve their differences: rotating a model is not evidence that the same representation supplies a validated acoustic simulation, and a plausible sound does not establish that its control mapping recreates historical playing conditions."
        },
        {
          "type": "heading",
          "text": "Let unavailable capabilities remain visible",
          "id": "unavailable-capabilities"
        },
        {
          "type": "p",
          "text": "An interface can show what a package supports, what requires another resource group and what the current runtime cannot execute. That makes a limited but honest experience more useful than a control that appears to work while silently substituting content. Users should be able to return from an interactive action to the resource and interpretation on which it depends."
        },
        {
          "type": "heading",
          "text": "Evaluate the claim made by the experience",
          "id": "evaluate-experience"
        },
        {
          "type": "p",
          "text": "Use technical tests for technical claims and appropriate empirical methods for perceptual or historical ones. Latency, signal agreement, package conformance and a player’s judgement of touch are different observations. The thesis’s technical demonstrations support bounded implementation and analytical claims; they do not replace participant studies of listening or playability."
        },
        {
          "type": "note",
          "title": "PAMT and VAO-Pipe have different scopes",
          "text": "PAMT outlines a route from geometry and material interpretation to room-acoustic modelling. VAO-Pipe evaluates passive eigenmodes of procedurally reconstructed pipes. Neither should be presented as a generic, complete synthesis engine for every VAO."
        },
        {
          "type": "links",
          "items": [
            {
              "label": "Open vaoXR",
              "href": "https://vaoxr.modavis.org/"
            },
            {
              "label": "Read the VAO notebook",
              "href": "/notebooks/vao/introduction/"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "Dominik Ukolov · Musikinstrumente im virtuellen Raum (2026)",
          "detail": "Dissertation submitted to Universität Leipzig, 11 September 2026. Chapters 1–6 and 8; Appendix I.4 for the software and resource inventory. See the dedicated research guides for claim-specific section references. Page numbers refer to the printed manuscript pagination. The manuscript is not distributed by this website."
        },
        {
          "label": "VAO Standard 0.5.0",
          "href": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22214248",
          "detail": "The versioned specification and reference tools."
        }
      ]
    },
    "figures": {}
  }
}